
% Table created by stargazer v.5.2 by Marek Hlavac, Harvard University. E-mail: hlavac at fas.harvard.edu
% Date and time: Fri, Apr 22, 2022 - 21:11:48
\begin{table}[!htbp] \centering 
  \caption{Effects of import competition on incumbency,
        exposure-robust standard errors} 
  \label{table_incumbency_ex} 
\begin{tabular}{@{\hspace{-10pt}}l@{\hspace{-10pt}}cccccc} 
\toprule 
 & \multicolumn{2}{c}{MP} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Local Party} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{National Party} \\ 
 & (1) & (2) & (3) & (4) & (5) & (6)\\ 
\midrule  
\\[-2.1ex] $\Delta$IPW & 0.002 & 0.009 & 0.010$^{**}$ & 0.001 & 0.004 & $-$0.0004 \\ 
  & (0.007) & (0.025) & (0.004) & (0.008) & (0.004) & (0.004) \\ 
 \addlinespace 
\midrule  
Years & All & 1900-1910 & All & 1900-1910 & All & 1900-1910 \\ 
First stage F-stat & 11.5 & 12.2 & 11.5 & 12.2 & 17.2 & 11.5 \\ 
Observations & 760 & 380 & 760 & 380 & 570 & 285 \\ 
\bottomrule 
\textit{Note:}  & \multicolumn{6}{l}{$^{*}$p$<$0.1; $^{**}$p$<$0.05; $^{***}$p$<$0.01} \\ 
 & \multicolumn{6}{l}{\parbox[t]{0.6\textwidth}{
        This table replicates the results of Table
        \ref{table_incumbency_cl} using the aggregation
        and standard error calculation methods recommended by Borusyak, Hull,
        and Jaravel (2022). Constituency-level variables aggregated to the industry level,
        (1)--(4) are estimated in levels and include constituency and year fixed effects,
        (5) and (6) in stacked first-differences, and include year fixed effects.
        For (1) and (2) the dependent variable is the share of the vote
        won by incumbent MPs, for (3) and (4), the share of the vote won by incumbent
        parties at the local level, for (5) and (6), the change in voteshare by the
        nationally-incumbent party. Standard errors clustered by industry in
        parentheses.}} \\ 
\end{tabular} 
\end{table} 
